CFA vs SFA piling

Two similar methods with some important differences

CFA piling and SFA piling are both bored, cast in-situ foundation methods that produce reinforced concrete piles. To the untrained eye the finished result looks broadly the same, and both methods share a number of advantages including low noise, low vibration, and suitability for urban and residential environments. However the way each method installs the pile is fundamentally different, and those differences have a real bearing on which one is appropriate for your site, your ground conditions, and your project constraints.

Understanding the distinction between the two helps ensure the right method is specified from the outset rather than having to reconsider part way through the design or installation process.

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Heading 4

Heading 5
Heading 6

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Block quote

Ordered list

  1. Item 1
  2. Item 2
  3. Item 3

Unordered list

  • Item A
  • Item B
  • Item C

Text link

Bold text

Emphasis

Superscript

Subscript

Are you struggling to find the answer you’re looking for?

Every site and project is different. If you still have questions or would like advice based on your drawings or site conditions, please contact our team, and we’ll be happy to help.

Contact Us
Icon

Subheading one

3
2
3
2
1
,
.
.
.
.
.
6
2
3
2
1
0
7
8
3
9
0
2
6
3
8

Residential piling jobs we’ve
completed over the years.